Astrofriend's homepage

www.astrofriend.eu
Share: Twitter Reddit Facebook Gmail Gmail Email
Search Astrofriend's homepage:

Valid CSS!

All pages shall now have been validated

Info Cookies (Kakor) / GDPR

Navigation

Advertisement /
Annons:

Advertisement / Annons:

Open Cluster
Messier 45, Pleiades


Object : M45
Coordinates/Direction : RA: 03h47m, DEC: +24o07'
Object size : 110'
Object magnitude : 1.6
More to know : Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/ Pleiades

M45 2018-12-05, back ground flatten

M45 open cluster December 5, 2018 (click on the image to get a full resolution photo in a new window)
Date : 2018-12-05
Time (UT) : 19:12 to 20:57
Mount : SkyWatcher Star Adventurer, light weight mount
Lens/telescope : Pentax 67 165 mm f/2.8 (medium format lens)
Corrector/Barlow : -
Field (FOV) : 12.4x8.3o (full frame) before crop
camera : Canon 6D, QE=0.5, full frame, 20 Mpixel, 14 bit
camera temperature: About 6o C above surrounding temperature
Film/CCD : Raw, Cr2
Filter : none
Control system : Camera focus by Canon Remote APP, camera exposure by intervallometer
Exp. time : 59x20 seconds iso6400, 19x30 seconds iso6400, 31x120 seconds iso1600, tot 1.5 hours
Image process tool : AstroImageJ, Fitswork, IrfanView
Processing : synthetic bias, flat calibration
Weather : clouds, temperature +6o C
Site : Sweden, Stockholm, Tyresta Nature reservation, Spirudden. Bortle 4
Comment : This time I use my medium format lens, the Pentax 67 165 mm at aperture f/2.8. I also used different ISO settings and exposures. The purpose of this you can read about here:
../../ tutorials/ tutorial-dynamics/ tutorial-dynamics.html

The clouds destroyed my attempt this night to get a beautiful image of the M45 nebula. The exposure time is 1.5 hour compare to the one below that has 2 hours exposure time. But this image is taken at f/2.8 and the one below is at f/4 so still it has more exposure.

Why I did this? I just found it interesting to compare an once very expensive medium format lens from 1980s with a 30 years newer APO lens.

This lens isn't as sharp as the Sigma APO 150 lens, or? But the vignetting is very low and I can use it at f/2.8. The Sigma lens I normally has to use at f/4. The problem with a non APO lens is that they don't focus all colors at the same focus. The red and blue color are out of focus. You see it in the full resolution image as blue and red rings around bright stars. It doesn't have a built in focus motor either.

It's hard to compare these images because of the clouds I got after one hour into the exposure session. I did a second variation of this image. I processed the back ground to be more flat to reduce the effect from clouds. Note that this image is not cropped more then a few pixels at the edges, a full frame sensor, not bad when looking at the stars at the edges.

You can read more about this medium format lens here:
../../projects/ project-pentax67-test/ project-test-pentax67-lens.html

And this link:
../../projects/ project-sigma-pentax-vignetting/ project-sigma-vs-pentax.html

This time I did my first test of the angled viewfinder that I connect to the polar scope, what a difference! You can read about it here:
../../projects/ project-star-adventurer-angled-viewfinder/ project-star-adventurer-angled-viewfinder.html

M45 2018-10-14

M45 open cluster October 14, 2018 (click on the image to get a full resolution photo in a new window)
Date : 2018-10-14
Time (UT) : 20:53 to 23:05
Mount : SkyWatcher Star Adventurer, light weight mount
Lens/telescope : Sigma APO 150 mm f/2.8 (set to f/4)
Corrector/Barlow : -
Field (FOV) : 13.6x9.1o (full frame) before crop
camera : Canon 6D, QE=0.5, full frame, 20 Mpixel, 14 bit
camera temperature: About 6o C above surrounding temperature
Film/CCD : Raw, Cr2
Filter : none
Control system : Camera focus by Canon Remote APP, camera exposure by intervallometer
Exp. time : 62x120 seconds, iso1600
Image process tool : AstroImageJ, Fitswork, IrfanView
Processing : crop, level, dark/bias constant subtracted
Weather : clear
Site : Sweden, Stockholm, Ingarö. Bortle 4
Comment : A second attempt to catch this object. This time I have done it in late autumn, then it's darker and I did it also with three times the exposure time. Now the nebulosity becomes more visible.

A crop around the Pleiades and more intensive processing to get more nebulosity. It can be processed much more but I prefer to have a mild processing to get it look more natural.

As you notice there is no color of the stars. It comes from the long exposures that oversaturated the readout device at this high ISO setting. Next time I will do much shorter sub exposures but more of them. In the Exif data I can read that the camera temperature was 12 C degree, the out door temperature about + 2 C degree.

M45 2016-08-26

M45 open cluster 16 august 2016 (click on the image to get a full resolution photo in a new window)
Date : 2016-08-26
Time (UT) : 22:30 to 23:14
Mount : SkyWatcher Star Adventurer, light weight mount
Lens/telescope : Sigma APO 150 mm f/2.8 (set to f/4)
Corrector/Barlow : -
Field (FOV) : 13.6x9.1o (full frame) before crop
camera : Canon 6D, QE=0.5, full frame, 20 Mpixel, 14 bit
camera temperature: About 6o C above surrounding temperature
Film/CCD : Raw, Cr2
Filter : none
Control system : Camera focus by Canon Remote APP, camera exposure by intervallometer
Exp. time : 19x130 seconds, iso1600 (the exif data say 129 sec but it should only had been 60 sec)
Image process tool : Fitswork
Processing : crop, level, cal in camera dark/bias subtracted
Weather : clear
Site : Sweden, Stockholm, Ingarö. Bortle 4
Comment : M45 is an open clusters, small islands of stars. This one also have a blue nebulosity.
The reason that I took this photo was to do a test of my new light portable mount, a Star Adventurer. One difficulty is to aim the RA axis for the polar star. I didn't expected much from this photo. 150mm is a long focal length in this case but it worked pretty well. Take a look of the full resolution photo and look at the stars, they are almost round, not elongated as I expected.
Go Back to content

Go Back

Advertisement / Annons: